On Thursday showed Senator Alejandro Muñoz-Alonso his latest book plano.Ocho Spain in the first years of foreign policy (1996-2004) , wrapped by the Staff of the People's Party University San Pablo CEU, leading to its head, and Jose Maria Aznar that ended, inevitably, be the protagonist the act. Was missed to Mariano Rajoy, but what can we do.
The true character ... and the usurper of the act.
More intervention of former President, I liked the intervention of the author of the book, that's why he wrote it, but the main actor of the book were present. Muñoz-Alonso has a bit of genius, and his constant and intelligent use of irony in his speech to confirm this. Irony, of course, led to the current rulers of Spain, "which is not to stop the cupboard empty, is that they took to the pantry." The truth is that ideologies section, the period 1996-2004 is interesting to analyze from the point of view of English foreign policy and the book of D. Alexander is not a bad tool for that.
It also discusses an argument from the point of view of the ever-hypocritical political correctness is welcome, and this is the English involvement in the war in Iraq: any .
populism Muñoz-Alonso leaves behind when he says that the work of the English troops stationed in Iraq was only reconstruction. Work, he acknowledges, "constantly blasted by terrorists. "criticism not noticed what he called the" pack of no-war "that he did not care for international law, since the Security Council ends up endorsing the presence of foreign troops on Iraqi soil, and ended up justifying the decision of sending troops as an action consistent with the English foreign policy, as "it was supporting an ally."
Senator concluded his comparatively brief statement saying "it costs up to a country, and how little it costs to demolish it. "
Aznar Fatalism
With less genius, but also full of arguments continued José María Aznar, for whom the current situation a "national crisis." Aznar added that "those who today want to break with Spain, finished with their symbols, including the monarchy.
Aznar continued his remarks referring to the socialist economic heritage, as "the strong economy, it is more useful than demagoguery. There is no better than a good foreign policy, domestic policy."
The former president defended the role of Europe to counterbalance "along with the U.S." and NATO as "defender of Democracies," although he lamented, rather than the current situation of our foreign policy "in the hands of dictators" with how difficult it will "rebuild the pieces", as "a serious country is that maintains a foreign policy at the time. " Which, according to Aznar "requires a PSOE wants to Spain."
----------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ----- COMMENT
More than intervention by Muñoz-Alonso, who has been consistent with his ideas throughout his career, I would like to discuss a few things Aznaril.
The first is that, at some point in the intervention were referred to the great figures of the history of Spain. Or San Juan de la Cruz, and Santa Teresa de Avila, or anyone. People either line, unfortunately.
The second: why socialists? Is it that no other party will be able to replace them in the English political spectrum? That confirms to me more and more that more than democracy, we are committed to a turnismo, and now govern us jerks. I wish the English political spectrum se encaminase más al Americano de los años 80, donde el malo era el comunista, que no tenía cabida en la mente del votante yankee
0 comments:
Post a Comment